March 25, 2014 Meeting
Agenda
Strategic Planning Committee
Agenda for Special Meeting
9:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, March 25, 2014
Human Resources Conference Room
To: Sam Aunai, Darcy Bogle, Agnes Eguaras, Greg Hawkins, Vicki Herder, David Layne,
Mark Williams
From: Eric Berube, Chair
Date: March 24, 2014
Recorder: Debi Wooley
Timekeeper: TBD
Agenda:
1. Approval of Minutes of the March 21, 2014 meeting – 5 minutes (9:00 am-9:05 am)
2. Institution-Set Standards – Eric – 55 minutes (9:05 am-10:00 am)
Objective: Produce recommendation for Governance Council on a set of Institution-Set Standards.
3. Adjournment
EB/dw
Minutes
Minutes of the Strategic Planning Committee
9:00 a.m., Tuesday, March 25, 2014
Human Resources Conference Room
Members Present: Sam Aunai, Eric Bérubé, Darcy Bogle, Agnes Eguaras, Greg Hawkins, Vicki Jacobi, Mark Williams
Members Absent: David Layne
Guests Present: Alex Castro, Brandy Young
Agenda:
1. Approval of Minutes of the March 21, 2014 meeting
The minutes were approved by consensus.
2. Institution-Set Standards – Eric
Objective: Produce recommendation for Governance Council on a set of Institution-Set Standards.
The SPC members came to consensus on the following:
1. There should be six measures for Institution-Set Standards:
TCS 1: Retention – enrolled in at least one class by end of term
TCS 2: Successful Course Completion – completion with a passing grade
TCS 3: Persistence – enrolling in all of first 3 consecutive terms
TCS 4: 30 Units – completing 30 units within three years
TCS 5: Remedial – starting pre-college completing college-level (English, Math and/or ESL)
TCS 6: Completion – completing a degree, certificate, transfer related outcome, or a course sequence in a CTE discipline
2. Cohorts would be defined as fall first time full time students although this would not preclude looking at other groups as appropriate.
3. Each measure should be disaggregated on a number of variables including but not limited to age group, gender, race/ethnicity, discipline, and program.
4. Disproportionate impact on any disaggregated measure would be defined by the “80% Rule,” which states that any subpopulation within the disaggregated data that falls below 80% of the highest performing subpopulation would trigger further investigation.
5. Small N would be taken into account when looking at disproportionate impact.
6. Specifics for who (committees, programs, etc) looks at specific disaggregated data and guidelines for what to do about findings of disproportionate impact would be decided upon in future meetings.
3. Adjournment—The meeting adjourned at 10:00 a.m.
Debra Wooley
Secretary